ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
No effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on response inhibition.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Response inhibition, which stops an ongoing action, is important for daily life activities. Reportedly, noradrenaline (NA), a neurotransmitter, is involved in response inhibition. In recent years, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has gained attention for its ability to induce NA release in various areas of the brain. Thus, taVNS can potentially improve response inhibition; however, this remains unverified. Methods: The present study investigated the effects of taVNS on response inhibition by measuring salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), an indirect indicator of NA. This study implemented a repeated-measures pre-post approach across conditions, with 24 healthy men (age, 21.3 ± 1.6 years) performing a stop signal task and undergoing sAA measurement before and after the taVNS intervention. taVNS was performed for 30 min at an intensity midway between the sensory and pain thresholds. Participants underwent two stimulation conditions, namely taVNS targeting the left concha and sham stimulation targeting the left earlobe, in a randomized order. Response inhibition was evaluated by comparing the stop signal reaction time (SSRT) before and after taVNS intervention. Results: Under taVNS, sAA levels significantly increased after the stimulation. However, no significant difference in SSRT was observed between before and after the intervention under either condition. Discussion: These results suggest that taVNS increases sAA levels after stimulation; however, it does not influence response inhibition, suggesting that the modulation of NA by taVNS is insufficient to improve response inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.