Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179704›Full record

ReviewSAGE open medicine2026

Outcomes associated with an inpatient addiction consult service: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tina E Abraham, Abdul Qadeer, Madeline H Meier, Areeba Fareed, Daniel L Roberts, Khalid Benkhadra, Gretchen A Colbenson, Amy E Kole, Jamie J Coracides, Umesh M Sharma and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tina E AbrahamDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Abdul QadeerDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2211-200X
Madeline H MeierDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Areeba FareedKarachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5906-9852
Daniel L RobertsDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Khalid BenkhadraDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Gretchen A ColbensonDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amy E KoleDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jamie J CoracidesDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Umesh M SharmaDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Samuel R ChouletDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Robert W KirchoffDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have high rates of hospitalization, readmission, and prolonged lengths of stay. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of addiction consult services in the inpatient setting for patients with SUD. Methods: Five databases were systematically searched from their earliest available records through January 2025. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of each study with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results: The search retrieved 20 studies that met inclusion criteria. The intervention for all studies was an addiction medicine consult, but the definition of this consult varied. The meta-analysis did not detect statistically significant differences in hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, or emergency department visits at 1 year among patients who received the consult compared with those who did not; however, many of these outcomes were likely underpowered. However, addiction medicine consults significantly improved the odds of inpatient initiation of medication for SUD (OR, 7.30; 95% CI, 3.30-16.13; Conclusion: Inpatient addiction consult services are associated with increased inpatient initiation of medication for SUD treatment and postdischarge treatment linkage and adherence. No clear association was identified between the consult and readmissions, emergency department utilization, or length of stay.

Indexed as

alcohol use disorderinpatient addiction medicine consultopioid use disordersubstance use disordersubstance use treatment

Identifiers

PMID42179704
PMCPMC13191137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.