ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2026
Comparative Study of Immobilization Protocols after Arthroscopic Suture of Peripheral and Foveal TFCC Injuries: A Cohort Study of 387 Patients.
Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is the main stabilizer of the distal radio-ulnar joint. There is a wide disparity in postoperative immobilization after arthroscopic suturing of the TFCC. Moreover, there are no studies focused specifically on the subject. Hypothesis: Because of its effect on pronosupination, we can ask ourselves whether immobilization of the elbow (during part or all of the immobilization) after arthroscopic suture of the TFCC is necessary. Materials and Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective, comparative study with an inclusion period of January 2015 to December 2021. The lesions were classified according to the Atzei classification with peripheral or foveal lesions. Patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative immobilization. We compared the postoperative results of arthroscopic suturing of the TFCC of peripheral and proximal lesions according to three methods of immobilization (6 weeks wrist immobilization [group 1]), 3 weeks wrist and elbow immobilization then 3 weeks wrist immobilization [group 2], and 6 weeks wrist and elbow immobilization [group 3]). The primary outcome was the QuickDASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand), and as secondary outcomes, range of motion (°), grip strength (kg), pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]), the presence of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, and postoperative complications were analyzed. After the operation, the patients were systematically followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The data collected are at 1 year of postoperative follow-up. Results: We included 387 patients in our study, with an average age of 32.6 years. A total of 302 peripheral lesions and 85 foveal lesions were included. Concerning the "peripheral" population, the difference in the QuickDASH was significantly different between the three groups with a greater improvement in group 2. Group 2 differed from the others in having less postoperative pain but less recovery of grip strength and flexion. Concerning the "foveal" population, the difference in the QuickDASH was significantly different between the three groups, with a greater improvement in group 1 with lower pain in this group. Discussion: With the results of this study, we propose to carry out an immobilization of 3 weeks wrist and elbow then 3 weeks only wrist for the peripheral lesions, and an immobilization 6 weeks of the pronosupination for the foveal lesions of TFCC. Level of Evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.