ArticleJournal of insect behavior2026
Testing Bottom-up Cuing Effects on Target Detection and Discrimination in Bumblebees.
Article in Journal of insect behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention in vertebrates helps prioritise the processing of important sensory information and filter out irrelevant signals. The capture of attention by sudden or salient stimuli is typically called bottom-up attention. Little is known about similar attentional processes in insects, although they should be advantageous for insects as well. We therefore adapted two paradigms used to investigate bottom-up attention in primates to investigate it in bumblebees: a target detection task and a target discrimination task. For both tasks, we trained bees to choose between two locations on each side of a computer screen and collect a reward below a full contrast target displayed on the screen. During detection task tests, the contrast of the target was varied, and it could be preceded by a cue flashed on the side of the target, the opposite side of the screen or not flashed at all. The discrimination task tests were similar but with a full contrast target on one side and a variable contrast distractor on the opposite side of the screen. We tested if the presence of the flash influenced the orientation and choices of the bees as well as their contrast sensitivity as has been seen in primates. We analysed bee choices using both direct observation of their behaviours at the trained locations and a trajectory analysis of high-speed videos. Our results show no effect of the prior cue, suggesting that other paradigms might prove more useful to test these processes in insects. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10905-026-09908-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.