ArticleCHEST pulmonary2026
Lung Cancer Yield by Baseline Screening Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) Assignment and Patient Factors: The Population-Based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence and mortality trends after introduction of lung cancer screening in a community-based healthcare system.Cancer epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer yield from lung cancer screening (LCS) via low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) may differ in community-based settings compared to clinical trials. RESEARCH QUESTION: What proportion of those receiving a baseline LCS LDCT in five healthcare systems in the United States were diagnosed with lung cancer within 12-months, overall, and by LCS findings and patient characteristics? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsStudy participants were LCS-eligible and received care and a baseline LCS LDCT within healthcare systems in the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium (PROSPR-Lung) from 2014-2020. We collected data on LCS utilization, results, patient characteristics, and smoking history via electronic health records. Baseline LCS LDCT findings were categorized using Lung-RADS, and lung cancer diagnoses were ascertained via cancer registries. The primary outcome was 12-month lung cancer yield.
resultsOf 13,448 patients, 47% were female, 48% ages <65 years, 74% White, 14% Black, 4% Hispanic, 3% Asian, and 1% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. There were 304 (2.3%) patients diagnosed with lung cancer within 12 months of baseline LDCT. Among those with Lung-RADS 1 (n=3,047) or 2 (n=7,978), there were 1 and 16 lung cancers, respectively. Among those with positive LCS findings (n=2,408), 12-month lung cancer yield was as follows: Lung-RADS 3=1.7%, 4-NOS (not otherwise specified)=38.5%, 4A=10.8%, 4B=38.8%, or 4X=69.2%. Among those with missing Lung-RADS (n=15), 1 lung cancer was diagnosed. Those at older ages, who currently smoked, with higher pack-years, greater comorbidity, or lower body mass index had higher lung cancer yields (p-value < 0.05).
interpretationLung cancer yield within 12 months after a baseline LDCT within PROSPR-Lung healthcare systems was higher than in LCS clinical trials. Differences may be attributable to higher smoking intensity, increased comorbidities, and an average older age at baseline scan in community settings compared to clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.