Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179646›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2026

Acute liver injury linked to an adulterated weight-loss product: Integrated clinical, chemical, and toxicological evidence supporting a highly probable causality as assessed by updated RUCAM (2016).

Ferdinando Lucas Góis, Fernando Novais Júnior, Daniela Carneiro de Oliveira, Vinícius Santos Nunes, Raymundo Paraná Ferreira Filho, Genario Oliveira Santos Júnior, Ademir Evangelista do Vale

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ferdinando Lucas GóisPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Assistance (PPGASFAR), Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Fernando Novais JúniorDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital Complex (HUPES), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Daniela Carneiro de OliveiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital Complex (HUPES), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Vinícius Santos NunesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital Complex (HUPES), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Raymundo Paraná Ferreira FilhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Edgard Santos University Hospital Complex (HUPES), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Genario Oliveira Santos JúniorPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Assistance (PPGASFAR), Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Ademir Evangelista do ValePostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Assistance (PPGASFAR), Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute liver injury associated with unregulated products marketed as dietary supplements is an emerging toxicological and public health concern, particularly due to the increasing prevalence of chemically adulterated formulations. Case presentation: A case of severe acute hepatocellular injury with marked aminotransferase elevation following short-term exposure to an Internet-purchased weight loss product is described. Clinical evaluation excluded alternative etiologies, including viral, autoimmune, and structural causes of liver injury. Methods: Causality was prospectively assessed using the updated RUCAM (2016). Chemical characterization was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), complemented by in vitro toxicity testing ( Results: The Updated RUCAM assessment yielded a score indicating a highly probable causal relationship between product exposure and liver injury. Analytical profiling has identified multiple undeclared synthetic pharmacologically active substances at supratherapeutic concentrations, confirming product adulteration. The experimental assays demonstrated marked biological activity, supporting the toxicological relevance of these findings. Conclusions: This case highlights the significant hepatotoxic risk associated with chemically adulterated and unregulated weight-loss products. The integration of clinical assessment, advanced analytical chemistry, and experimental toxicology provides a robust translational framework for causal inference in suspected product-related liver injury, and underscores the need for strengthened pharmacovigilance systems targeting illicit or unregulated products.

Indexed as

Adulterated productsDrug-induced liver injuryHepatotoxicityHerb-induced liver injuryTranslational pharmacovigilanceUpdated RUCAM

Identifiers

PMID42179646
PMCPMC13195359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.