ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of cranberry (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cranberry is a small fruit crop with great development potential. Due to its shallow root system and dominance of fibrous roots, it is highly susceptible to drought stress, but the response mechanism is still unclear. In this study, "Bain 11" cranberry was used as the material, and four pot treatments were set up: normal water supply (CK), mild (D1), moderate (D2), and severe (D3) drought. After reaching the set stress levels, functional leaves were collected. The response mechanism to different degrees of drought was clarified by combining paraffin sectioning, chlorophyll fluorescence, spectrophotometry, and transcriptome sequencing technology. The results showed that there was no significant change in the rate of photosynthetic oxygen release under D1 conditions; under D2 conditions, the function of PSII was impaired, but the heat dissipation capacity was enhanced, and the protective mechanism was activated; under D3 conditions, the performance of both PSII and PSI was significantly inhibited, the damage to the oxygen-evolving complex was the most severe, and the photosynthetic oxygen production decreased significantly. Leaf anatomical structure showed that with the intensification of drought, the morphology, area, and density of stomata changed, and the thickness of palisade tissue, epidermis, and spongy tissue decreased; under D2 conditions, organelle membranes were deformed but intact, and the thylakoid lamellar spacing increased; under D3 conditions, organelle membranes ruptured, nuclear material leaked, chloroplasts vacuolated, and thylakoid lamellae disintegrated. The oxidative stress indicators MDA and H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.