Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Research on plant knowledge graph reasoning based on dual-channel attention and topological perception.

Shasha Wang, Yongye Su, Hui Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shasha WangVirtual Simulation and Big Data Engineering Technology Research Center, School of Data Science, Hebi Polytechnic, Hebi, China.
Yongye SuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China.
Hui GaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) in the plant domain frequently contain "long-range dependency" paths (e.g., taxonomic hierarchies or ecological association chains of 4 or more hops), which pose significant challenges to existing KG reasoning models. Traditional Graph Neural Network (GNN) models struggle to effectively capture such long-range dependencies due to issues of long-distance information compression and over-smoothing. To address this, we propose the KRGAI-PLANT model, an inductive reasoning framework specifically designed for plant knowledge graphs. This model features a dual-channel architecture that integrates a global attention mechanism with local topology perception, enabling synergistic learning between global semantic interactions and local structural features among plant entities. We conduct experimental validation on subsets constructed from mainstream plant knowledge graphs, including DBpedia and PlantNet-KG. The results demonstrate that KRGAI-PLANT achieves significant improvements over baseline models such as GraIL and NBFNet in key evaluation metrics, including Hits@10 and AUC-PR, particularly exhibiting strong advantages in handling long-path reasoning tasks. This study provides an effective reasoning tool for knowledge discovery and association prediction in the plant domain. Furthermore, the proposed KRGAI-PLANT model offers a robust cognitive framework that can empower distributed and autonomous agricultural systems by converting complex, multi-source plant data into actionable knowledge for precise decision-making.

Indexed as

attention mechanismgraph neural networksknowledge graph reasoninglong-range dependency modelingplant knowledge graph

Identifiers

PMID42179512
PMCPMC13194416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.