Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42179483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Synthetic plant disease image generation to improve segmentation tasks in low-resource settings.

Elliott Cooper, Zane Hartley, Andrew French

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elliott CooperSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Zane HartleySchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew FrenchSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate plant disease segmentation is often constrained by the availability of large, finely annotated datasets, particularly for rare diseases. This work presents a synthetic data generation pipeline that combines 3D leaf modelling with diffusion-based disease synthesis to address this limitation. Procedurally-generated leaf geometries are built in the 3D modelling package Blender to provide exact ground-truth masks, after which style-transfer is applied using Stable Diffusion, fine-tuned with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and guided by ControlNet conditioning to both preserve leaf structure and enforce correct lesion placement. The approach is evaluated on apple leaf diseases using a deliberately restricted subset of the PlantVillage dataset, simulating a controlled low-data-resource environment. Downstream task effectiveness is measured through leaf disease segmentation. The results show that combining data from the pipeline with limited real data leads to consistent improvements in segmentation performance.

Indexed as

ControlNetleaf segmentationlow-rank adaptationlow-resource learningplant disease detectionsemantic segmentationstable diffusionsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID42179483
PMCPMC13194994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.