ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026
Biochemical verification of tobacco use in ICU patients using point-of-care urinary cotinine.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Obtaining an accurate smoking history can be challenging in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of nicotine exposure using a point-of-care urine cotinine test in a heterogeneous cohort of critically ill patients and to compare this to the smoking history in the medical record. Design setting and participants: In 481 adult patients we prospectively undertook a urine cotinine test within 24 h of admission using a point-of-care binary colorimetric assay with a detection threshold of 200 ng/mL. Smoking history was retrieved from the electronic medical record. Main outcome measures and results: Urinary cotinine was detected in 151 of 481 patients (31.4%), exceeding the 134 participants with a documented history of current smoking by 3.5% (relative increase 12.7%). A positive urine cotinine test was reported in 12% (40/347) of participants not known to be actively smoking, including 18 'former smokers', 12 'non-smokers', and 10 in whom smoking status was unknown. Cotinine-positive participants were ventilated for longer than cotinine-negative patients; a median of 71 h vs. 44 h (median difference of 30h, 95% CrI: 5.6 to 56); they were more likely to have a "code-grey" event; 34 of 151 (23%) vs. 24/330 (7.3%); median relative risk of 3.1 (95% CrI, 1.9-5.1); and were more likely to "discharge against medical advice"; 12/125 (10%) vs 3/275 (1%), with a median relative risk of 9.7 (95% CrI, 3.0-46). Conclusions: Urinary cotinine testing offers a point-of-care determination of current tobacco smoking status in the critically ill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.