ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026
Reevaluating basic life support termination criteria using post-arrival data in Japanese out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Termination of resuscitation (TOR) rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are applied worldwide. However, in some Asian countries, TOR is restricted by law or practice. We assessed the benefits of including post-arrival variables on the accuracy of the basic life support (BLS)-TOR rule in eligible patients. Design: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Setting: A nationwide Japanese OHCA registry. Participants: We evaluated 81,234 patients recorded in a nationwide Japanese OHCA registry between 2014 and 2021 who were transported to 161 emergency hospitals. After applying exclusion criteria, 59,114 patients were included in the analysis. Among these, 43,737 patients fulfilled the BLS-TOR criteria. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was 30-day survival and the secondary outcome was a favourable neurological status, defined as a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2 at 30 days. Results: The 30-day survival and favourable neurological outcome rates were 0.9% and 0.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified serum potassium as the strongest predictor of poor outcomes (adjusted odds ratio for survival: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.49). When serum potassium thresholds were added to the BLS-TOR criteria, survival rates declined progressively-0.72, 0.40, and 0.21% at ≥5.0, ≥6.0, and ≥7.0 mEq/L, respectively. At ≥7.0 mEq/L, specificity for predicting 30-day mortality reached 0.99, and the positive predictive value was 1.00. Conclusions: Incorporating post-arrival in-hospital variables provides a novel approach to guide TOR. Serum potassium, a readily measured arrival marker, is one promising candidate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.