ArticleCell transplantation
Feasibility of post-induction consolidation with BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not proceeding to ASCT: A preliminary case series.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, evidence supporting its use in earlier treatment settings remains limited. This study presents a preliminary case series evaluating the feasibility of BCMA CAR-T cell therapy as post-induction consolidation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who did not proceed to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Four patients were included in this analysis. After induction therapy, all patients achieved very good partial response or better and did not proceed to ASCT due to ineligibility or personal preference. They subsequently received BCMA CAR-T cell therapy as consolidation treatment. All patients tolerated the BCMA CAR-T cell infusion well. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in all cases, but was limited to grades 1-2, and no immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was observed. Following therapy, patients maintained or further deepened responses and ultimately reached stringent complete response (sCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. During a median follow-up period of 17.8 months, all patients remained in sCR status and MRD negativity without the need for additional anti-tumor therapy, and none experienced relapse or disease progression. These preliminary results suggest that BCMA CAR-T cell therapy as post-induction consolidation is feasible and associated with manageable toxicity in NDMM patients not proceeding to ASCT, warranting further evaluation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.