SynthesisClinical and translational science2026
Effects of Nacubactam and Its Metabolites on QTc Interval: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Phase 1 Studies.
Synthesis in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nacubactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor. Early-phase studies with 1000/2000/4000/8000 mg nacubactam monotherapy were not powered to assess proarrhythmic risk. Therefore, this analysis pooled electrocardiogram data from two placebo-controlled studies to quantify potential effects of nacubactam on cardiac repolarization. The primary endpoint was ΔQTcF, denoting the time-matched change in QT interval corrected for heart rate. The primary estimand was mean ΔΔQTcF (placebo-corrected ΔQTcF) in healthy adults at double the maximum clinically relevant exposure levels of nacubactam/metabolites. Mixed models for repeated measures and concentration-QTc modeling were used to analyze ΔQTcF. From Mixed models for repeated measures, most 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF fell below 10 ms, but there were some inconsistencies at 3 h after 1000/2000 mg doses, where 90% confidence intervals straddled 10 ms. However, after 4000/8000 mg doses, 90% confidence intervals fell below 10 ms, with no trend of increasing QTcF prolongation with increasing dose in pooled or individual study data. Moreover, from concentration-QTc modeling, 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF were below 10 ms for maximum clinically relevant exposure levels, with no evidence of concentration-dependent effects. Results from concentration-QTc modeling fell below the safety margin of 10 ms at relevant analyte levels. While certain confidence intervals from Mixed models for repeated measures straddled 10 ms at 3 h after 1000/2000 mg doses, these inconsistencies were not sustained and not evident at higher doses. Overall, findings support the safety of nacubactam and justify evaluation in larger, multidose, combination-therapy studies and provide regulatory-relevant evidence supporting progression to multidose and combination therapy trials without the need for a dedicated thorough QT study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.