ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Value-Based Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of value-based medicine reflects a transformation from volume incentivized care to a quality-of-care directed reimbursement model. Value-based medicine aims to concurrently improve health care quality and control growing health care expenditures by aligning evidence-based and patient-centered interventions with sustainable resource use. We apply a value-based medicine framework to abdominal aortic aneurysm care delivery, highlighting opportunities to improve patient outcomes, optimize resource allocation, and reduce health care expenditures across the continuum of disease management. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, evaluating recent clinical guidelines, economic analyses, and real-world practice data on abdominal aortic aneurysm management, including screening, surveillance, timing of intervention, modality selection (endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair), and follow-up strategies. Contemporary real-world published practice patterns reveal wide variation in screening uptake, surveillance intensity, repair criteria thresholds, procedure and device selection, and post-endovascular aneurysm repair imaging, producing inconsistent outcomes and inefficient spending. Endovascular aneurysm repair predominates in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair because of lower perioperative morbidity and shorter length of stay; however, downstream costs from surveillance, endoleak management, and reinterventions may erode its initial economic advantage over open surgical repair. Key value drivers include risk-aligned screening, standardized surveillance anchored to anatomy and device risk, judicious use of advanced imaging, optimized perioperative pathways, and careful device selection. Savings opportunities include predictive analytics to individualize surveillance, deescalation of routine computed tomography after documented sac shrinkage, smoking cessation, medical optimization, and structured shared decision-making aligned with life expectancy and patient preferences. Integrating value-based medicine principles into abdominal aortic aneurysm care through regional centers of excellence, bundled reimbursement models, transparent cost structures, and surveillance strategies may offer a pragmatic roadmap to achieve safer, economically sustainable, and patient-centered management, ultimately advancing both clinical outcomes and cost efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.