ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2026
In Silico Fragment Size Selection for Enhanced Fetal Fraction and Abnormality Origin Discernment Using Pair-End Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Silico Fragment Size Selection for Enhanced Fetal Fraction and Abnormality Origin Discernment Using Pair-End Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new bioinformatics pipeline that improves fetal DNA fraction (FF), determines the origin of chromosomal abnormalities, and better detects sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs) than routine NIPT.
methodsWe used a bioinformatic strategy that filters out longer DNA fragments, thereby significantly improving the FF. By combining the filtered data with the original data, we determined the origin of detected abnormalities.
resultsWe analyzed samples from 204 pregnancies. Using routing NIPT methods, 36 samples were negative, 37 exhibited low FF, and 131 were detected as positive. Applying the method of this study, all the low FF samples were qualified for analysis. Furthermore, 56 samples initially classified as positive were identified to be false positives, predominantly caused by maternal abnormalities. No false negative results were observed with this method.
conclusionWe developed a pipeline for NIPT that significantly improves FF, which helps deduce the origin of abnormalities and detect more karyotypes of SCAs. The strategy has the potential to improve the specificity of NIPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.