ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Successive waves of transcriptional repression and de-repression license cell cycle progression in an archaeon.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Archaea of the order Sulfolobales execute a well-structured cell cycle program similar to that of eukaryotic cells. Here, we show that three ribbon-helix-helix domain transcription factors, aCcr1, aCcr2, and aCcr3, play pivotal roles in controlling the cell cycle progression in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Saccharolobus islandicus by licensing the timely transcription of the key genes that define the cell cycle phases. The three transcription factors act as repressors and recognize similar regulatory sequences. However, their expression timing during the cell cycle differs. The disengagement of aCcr2 from the recognized promoters prior to the M phase appears to be controlled through its phosphorylation by the cyclically-expressed eukaryotic-like kinase aCcrK (ePK2). The synergy between aCcr1, aCcr2, and aCcr3 is also achieved through their differential affinities for the promoters and the levels of protein expression. The global regulation of the Sulfolobales cell cycle may be achieved not through transcriptional activation, but rather by repression of the key genes during strategic moments of the cell cycle. We propose a phosphorylation-assisted braking-point model for the cell cycle control in Sulfolobales, which may represent a simple evolutionary intermediate on the way to the more complex cell cycle regulation in eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.