ReviewJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2026
The development of translational tasks for preclinical psychedelic research in psychiatry.
Review in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights toward dissociating therapeutic from psychedelic effects: bridging the gap between psychedelic research and mental health care.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders represent a particularly challenging area of medicine to study using non-human animals. They arise from a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors and are diagnosed using clinical interviews and diagnostic criteria based largely on self-reported symptoms and with significant heterogeneity seen within patient populations. Anxiety and major depressive disorder are the most diagnosed psychiatric disorders, with prescriptions of antidepressants exceeding 80 million in the UK in 2024. Despite more than 70 years of research, we do not understand how antidepressants achieve their effects on mood. With a resurgence in interest in developing new treatments based on clinical advances in the psychedelic field, there is a pressing need for translational methods to study the underlying mechanisms and provide reliable predictions of clinical effects. Human studies are limited in terms of the resolution of current imaging methods and the depth of mechanistic interrogation which can be achieved. Studies involving non-human animals offer an important avenue to understand how psychedelics alter behaviour and the underlying mechanisms mediating these effects, as well as playing a critical role in the development of new drugs. However, the value of these studies in terms of delivering outcomes for patients will only be achieved if the methods used have clinical relevance. In this perspective article, I consider whether 'behavioural biomarkers', and their translation to animal tasks, could achieve this much-need approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.