ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Assessing and strengthening community-based coastal governance.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based coastal governance is essential for biodiversity conservation and sustainable livelihoods, yet many communities continue to face significant challenges in establishing and sustaining effective governance systems. We sought to improve understanding of the current status of community-based coastal governance across five countries in the Southwest Indian Ocean (SWIO) region of Africa. Using the Elinor tool and data system, we examined how specific governance attributes relate to perceived social and ecological outcomes and sought insights for community-managed areas (CMAs) in the SWIO region. Progress toward strong community-based governance of CMAs has been uneven across the region and across governance attributes. Although some CMAs have established clearly defined management boundaries and property rights, many other CMAs are still working to improve some attributes, such as congruent regulations, transparency, accountability, and operational capacity. Perceived ecological and social outcomes correlated with different governance attributes. Perceived ecological outcomes were positively correlated with measures of property rights and local governance, whereas perceived social outcomes were correlated with local governance and operational capacity. The strength of CMA governance tended to improve in the first 5-10 years after establishment, then governance attributes plateaued or declined thereafter. These findings coincide with typical funding cycles, thus reinforcing the value of continued investment in community-based coastal governance. Specifically, our findings point to the importance of providing long-term capacity development and securing durable conservation finance to ensure the success of CMAs. More broadly, these findings contribute to a growing body of evidence of the importance of paying attention to when and how to leverage different types of support and capacity building.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.