Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178459›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with upper urinary system anomalies: evaluating the prevalence, types, characteristics and comparing its outcomes with other patients: a prospective, comparative study of 1485 patients.

Anahita Ansari Djafari, Babak Javanmard, Mohammad Seifipoor, Sina Samenezhad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anahita Ansari DjafariLaser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Department of Urology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak JavanmardLaser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Department of Urology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad SeifipoorShohada-E-Tajrish Hospital, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammad.seifipoor@sbmu.ac.ir.
Sina SamenezhadShohada-E-Tajrish Hospital, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePCNL plays an important role in the treatment of kidney stones, but since it is less defined for patients with anomalous urinary system, their management is challenging. This study attempts to resolve this issue to help the urologist to properly assess the patients before, during, and after surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective study data were collected for 1485 PCNL candidates treated over 3 years (Sep 2022-Dec 2025). According to preoperative and intraoperative imaging, the samples were divided into two groups: abnormal (n = 121) and normal (n = 1364) groups and compared.

resultsThe prevalence of anomalies was 8.1%, with bifid or trifid pelvis 4.5%, mal-rotation 1.3%, duplex system 1.1%, infundibulum stenosis 0.5%, and horseshoe kidney 0.4% being the most common, and others being rare. In the anomaly group, the stones were mostly mixed (73.5%) with a dominant calcium component. Uric acid and struvite types were slightly more common than in the normal group. There was no statistically significant gender difference between the two groups. (P = 0.54) The mean age of the normal group was 40.8 ± 8.6 years and the anomaly group was 37.9 ± 8.8 years. The mean length of hospitalization in the anomaly group was 3.60 ± 0.89 days which was significantly longer than the normal group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in body mass index (BMI) between the groups (P = 0.144). In the anomaly group, 84.3% had a history of related procedures. Number of access in the anomaly group was more than in the normal group (1.09 ± 0.28 vs. 1.18 ± 0.39 and P = 0.01). There were more upper access and puncture sites. In the anomaly group, the surgical duration was 66.5 ± 28.1 min, which was more than in the normal group. (P = 0.0003) In the anomaly group, 73.6% were stone-free in the first operation, compared to 82.2% in the normal group. (P = 0.019) Postoperative complications in the anomaly group occurred in 47.1% and more than in normal individuals, but major complications in the anomaly group were comparable to the normal group. (P = 0.43).

conclusionTypes of urinary system anomalies and their prevalence in PCNL candidate patients and postoperative outcomes indicate the importance of the subject. It seems necessary to achieve appropriate criteria for comparison and correct understanding of future studies. Ultimately, PCNL in patients with upper urinary tract anomalies is associated with increased technical complexity, reduced stone-free rates, and higher overall complication rates. Although it remains a viable treatment modality, these outcomes should be carefully considered during preoperative counseling and surgical planning.

Indexed as

AnomalyOutcomesPCNLPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.