Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178392›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Sassy: fuzzy searching DNA sequences using SIMD.

Rick Beeloo, Ragnar Groot Koerkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rick BeelooDepartment of Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584CH, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-6984-1294
Ragnar Groot KoerkampDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-1237

Funding

ETH Research ETH-17 21-1ZonMw 541003001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationApproximate string matching (ASM) is the problem of finding all occurrences of a pattern in a text while allowing up to k errors. Many modern methods use seed-chain-extend, which is fast in practice, but does not guarantee finding all matches with ≤k errors. However, applications such as CRISPR off-target detection require exhaustive results.

resultsWe introduce Sassy, a library and tool for ASM of short patterns in long texts. Sassy splits the text into four parts that are searched in parallel, and uses bitvectors in the text direction rather than the pattern direction. This has complexity O(k⌈n/W⌉) when searching a random text of length n, where W=256 is the SIMD width, and provides significant speedups for small k. Separately, we allow matches of the pattern to extend beyond the text for an overhang cost of, e.g. α=0.5 per character, to find matches near contig or read ends.Sassy is 4× to 15× faster than Edlib for patterns ≤1000 bp, and can search text with a throughput near 2 Gbp/s. Likewise, Sassy is over 100× faster than parasail. We apply Sassy to CRISPR off-target detection by searching 61 guide sequences in a human genome. Sassy is 100× faster than SWOffinder and only slightly slower (for k≤3) than CHOPOFF, for which building its index takes 20 min. Sassy also scales well to larger k, unlike CHOPOFF whose index took over 10 h to build for k=5. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Sassy is available as library and binary at https://github.com/RagnarGrootKoerkamp/sassy, and archived at swh:1:dir:e884758dce5777a441bc2799dc8824e563c5f97b.

Indexed as

DNASequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAlgorithmsBase SequenceDNA

Identifiers

PMID42178392
PMCPMC13202463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.