ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Evaluation and improvement of two European soybean VCU networks.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max, (L.) Merr.) productivity gains depend on accurate estimates of genetic trends, genotypic effects (G), and genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI). Here, we compiled a Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) database of soybean varieties, evaluated from 2003 to 2018 in Austria (AT) and France (FR), to estimate genetic trends, G and GEI magnitudes, and variety-testing precision in grain yield, protein yield and protein content (%), using mixed-model methodology. We found that G and GEI variances were comparable in both countries, with a variety-testing precision, expressed as a relative detection threshold (LSD for elite standards), of about 7.5% for grain yield and protein yield, and about 2% for protein content. Grain yield correlated moderately negatively with protein content at the genotypic level. Despite this, although genetic trends in protein content were non-significant and near-zero (slightly negative in FR), trends in grain yield and protein yield were significant and strongly positive (1.97-2.05% yr
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.