ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
MarkerMatch: a proximity-based probe-matching algorithm for joint analysis of copy-number variants from different genotyping arrays.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCopy-number variants (CNVs) are a form of genetic structural variation with increasing importance in complex human disorders. Both DNA sequencing and microarray data can be used to detect CNVs, which can be used in genetic association tests. Unlike genotypes, CNV detection in microarrays requires the use of observed intensity signals at each probe, which limits the imputability for analyses that span multiple array types. Thus far, a consensus set of probes (those present on all arrays) has been used to circumvent the problem of differing array-specific sensitivities. This has led to excessive reduction in overall sensitivity since arrays can have an undesirably low probe overlap. To overcome this limitation, we developed MarkerMatch, a proximity-based algorithm that matches probes across different genotyping microarrays to maximize the number of probes considered in the CNV calling algorithm, thereby increasing the resolution and sensitivity while preserving precision.
resultsBy analyzing CNV calls from 4906 individuals genotyped across three different arrays, we show that the MarkerMatch approach improves sensitivity by increasing the density of probes available for CNV calling while maintaining precision or improving it relative to the current practice (e.g. use of consensus probes only). We further demonstrate that MarkerMatch matches the CNV detection from current practice in terms of F1 score and PPV for larger CNVs. We also optimize MarkerMatch parameters, DMAX and Method, and find an optimal DMAX setting at 10 kb, with no clear optimal candidate based on Method, indicating that parameters for this metric should be determined on a use case basis. AVAILABILITY: The R package for MarkerMatch is available at: https://github.com/FranjoIM/MarkerMatch. The code used for analysis and implementation is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18460979. The live notebook is available at https://fivankovic.notion.site/2026-markermatch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.