ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and evaluation of a recreational water quality index for the Red Sea Coastline, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recreational water quality in coastal areas is vital for public health, especially in urban regions. In this study, a recreational water quality index (RWQI) tailored to the Red Sea coastline in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was developed to assess water quality at popular beaches. The samples were collected from three different locations. To develop the RWQI, relevant water quality parameters, such as the pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), Escherichia coli (E. coli), and enterococci, were identified and weighted on the basis of their significance for recreational water safety. These parameters were rated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Saudi Arabia Ambient Water Quality Standards (SAAWQS). The results were then aggregated into a single index score reflecting the overall water quality. The results revealed that Obhur Al-Shamaliya exhibited generally good water quality, particularly in winter, with index scores ranging from 83 to 98, meeting both the WHO and Saudi standards. All three sites recorded poorer water quality during the second sampling period in summer, with nutrient enrichment and E. coli counts exceeding permissible limits (2,300, 3,875, and 2,58.13 CFU/100 mL, respectively), resulting in an index classification as unsuitable for recreational purposes. The urban runoff sites were at high risk, with elevated pollution. Moreover, a one-way ANOVA test confirmed that the seasonal variation in the RWQI was statistically significant (F = 8.29, p = 0.045), emphasizing the influence of environmental factors, such as temperature and runoff, on recreational water quality. These findings underscore the need for season-specific monitoring and management strategies in coastal recreational areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.