Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178357›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A large Chinese dataset of ten-category semantic relations with developmental performance in children and adolescents.

Jiayi Fu, Chuqi Liu, Shuaihui Mou, Liang Shi, Liang Zhang, Xiaojing Peng, Tong Li, Huinan Hu, Mingxue Fu, Gui Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiayi Fu *State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Chuqi Liu *State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Shuaihui MouState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Liang ShiSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, PR China.
Liang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Xiaojing PengState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Tong LiState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Huinan HuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Mingxue FuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China.
Gui XueState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, PR China. gxue@bnu.edu.cn.

Funding

111 project BP071903the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32330039 and 32441110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic relations are fundamental to human conceptual knowledge and underpin cognitive processes such as categorization, analogical reasoning, and language comprehension. Despite extensive research on semantic relations in English, a systematic Chinese dataset aligned with established taxonomies remains unavailable, limiting cross-linguistic and developmental research. Here, we present a large-scale Chinese semantic relation dataset based on the ten-category taxonomy proposed by Bejar et al., comprising 1,000 typical word pairs that were behaviorally validated. Initially, 3,758 candidate word pairs were generated by 32 college students and subsequently validated via a semantic relation judgment task with 5,898 participants aged 9-18 years. The final dataset includes relation labels, concreteness ratings for 2,295 unique words, and behavioral measures across developmental stages. Developmental analyses revealed significant age-related increases in accuracy for most semantic relations, with performance in most relations approaching a plateau at ages 15-17. This dataset provides validated materials and developmental performance patterns for investigating semantic cognition in Chinese-speaking populations, with applications in cognitive psychology, developmental science, computational linguistics, and natural language processing.

Indexed as

CognitionSemanticsAdolescentChildChinaDatasets as TopicFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID42178357
PMCPMC13219397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.