ArticleScientific reports2026
Prevalence, morphology, and management of coronary cameral fistulas detected on cardiac CT: a multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the prevalence, morphology, and clinical outcomes of coronary cameral fistulas (CCFs) detected on cardiac computed tomography (CT) at three tertiary centers. We retrospectively reviewed 22,641 patients who underwent cardiac CT between January 2012 and July 2025. The CCF cases were identified through a PACS search. Two radiologists independently assessed the origin vessel, drainage site, fistula number, and diameter. The clinical data was obtained from electronic medical records. The CCFs were identified in 15 patients; 14 were analyzed after excluding one patient who lacked preoperative imaging. Seven (50.0%) patients were symptomatic at diagnosis. Two (14.3%) patients had dual coronary origins, totaling 16 origin vessels. Of the 16 origin vessels, the right coronary artery was the most common (n = 6, 42.9%). The drainage sites included the left ventricle (35.7%), right atrium (28.6%), right ventricle (21.4%), and left atrium (14.3%). The median maximal fistula diameter was 4.2 mm; the surgical patients (n = 4, 28.6%) had significantly larger fistulas. During a 19-month median follow-up, no CCF-related adverse cardiac events occurred. The CCFs are rare anomalies identified on CCTA (prevalence of 0.07%). Surgical patients had larger fistula dimensions than conservatively managed patients, and no CCF-related adverse cardiac events occurred during midterm follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.