ArticleScientific reports2026
NMR-based metabolomics analysis in breast cancer patients from Saudi Arabia: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In breast cancer (BC), metabolomic profiles have largely focused on Western and East Asian groups, with limited data from the Middle East. Population-specific studies are required to better understand metabolite alterations due to regional, environmental and genetic heterogeneity. This exploratory pilot study aimed to evaluate serum metabolic alterations in breast cancer patients and their associations with disease stage using NMR-based metabolomics in the Saudi Arabian cohort. A total of 30 female breast cancer patients and 30 healthy controls were included. Patient samples showed higher levels of ketoglutarate, glutamine, lipids, and branched-chain amino acids, while acetate, creatine, and glucose were lower in the patient group (all FDR q < 0.05). Ketoglutarate (AUC = 0.85), glutamine (AUC = 0.84), and lipids (AUC = 0.82) demonstrated discriminatory ability. A combined model incorporating acetate and ketoglutarate achieved an AUC of 0.91. With advancing disease stage, lactate (p-trend = 0.005), leucine (p-trend = 0.044), and glutamate (p-trend = 0.033) showed decreasing trends. Lactate, choline, and glucose were each independently associated with more advanced disease in multivariable models. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA), supervised partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) showed metabolic separation between patients and controls. Permutation testing indicated that class separation exceeded random classification; however, overfitting remains possible due to reliance on internal validation. The negative Q² value (- 0.577) indicates poor predictive generalizability. In conclusion, this study identifies candidate metabolite signatures associated with breast cancer in a Saudi cohort. These findings require validation in independent cohorts before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.