ArticleScientific reports2026
Task-oriented visual SLAM: a comprehensive map classification framework for dynamic indoor robot manipulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (vSLAM) is fundamental to enabling robotic mobile manipulation-i.e., the seamless integration of navigation, perception, and dexterous interaction with objects in unstructured environments. Yet current vSLAM research largely lacks a principled, task-oriented framework for map classification, resulting in suboptimal map representations that hinder robustness and efficiency in dynamic indoor settings. To bridge this gap, we propose a purpose-driven taxonomy of vSLAM maps specifically designed for mobile manipulation tasks. This taxonomy comprises four complementary categories: geometric 3D maps, semantic maps, object-level maps, and hybrid maps-each distinguished by its representational granularity, functional scope, and suitability for downstream manipulation primitives. We provide a systematic comparative analysis of their construction pipelines, underlying technical assumptions, and real-world deployment contexts, evaluating them rigorously across three critical dimensions: environmental adaptability, pose estimation accuracy, and real-time computational feasibility. Finally, we synthesize key limitations in existing approaches and identify concrete, high-impact directions for future work-including tight coupling between mapping semantics and manipulation affordances, and scalable learning-based map fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.