Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178323›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Tactical and assessment competency gaps in pre-service coaches: evidence from a game-based implementation.

Eyup Acar, Yasin Akinci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eyup AcarDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Usak University, Usak, Turkey. eyupacar800@gmail.com.
Yasin AkinciDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Usak University, Usak, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined tactical and assessment competency gaps in pre-service coaches within a structured game-based implementation context. An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, 40 pre-service candidates (24 Physical Education Teacher Education [PET], 16 Coach Education [CE]) were evaluated using the Educational Game Playing Skill Observation Scale, assessing preparation, implementation, and evaluation competencies. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with expert academics to provide contextual explanation of the quantitative findings. Results indicated that CE students outperformed PET students in game management and organizational dimensions. However, both groups demonstrated substantial deficiencies in higher-order tactical and assessment competencies, particularly in reflective evaluation, post-game analysis, and in-game tactical facilitation. Effect sizes were in the small-to-medium range yet consistently indicated structural competency gaps extending beyond technical proficiency. These findings suggest that current coach education pathways insufficiently develop tactical facilitation and evaluative expertise within game-based instructional practices. Systematic curricular integration of practice-based modules explicitly targeting tactical intervention and performance evaluation is recommended.

Indexed as

Physical Education and TrainingProfessional CompetenceFemaleHumansAssessment competencyCoach educationGame-based implementationMixed methodsPre-service coachesTactical competency

Identifiers

PMID42178323
PMCPMC13429655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.