ArticleScientific reports2026
Tactical and assessment competency gaps in pre-service coaches: evidence from a game-based implementation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined tactical and assessment competency gaps in pre-service coaches within a structured game-based implementation context. An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, 40 pre-service candidates (24 Physical Education Teacher Education [PET], 16 Coach Education [CE]) were evaluated using the Educational Game Playing Skill Observation Scale, assessing preparation, implementation, and evaluation competencies. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with expert academics to provide contextual explanation of the quantitative findings. Results indicated that CE students outperformed PET students in game management and organizational dimensions. However, both groups demonstrated substantial deficiencies in higher-order tactical and assessment competencies, particularly in reflective evaluation, post-game analysis, and in-game tactical facilitation. Effect sizes were in the small-to-medium range yet consistently indicated structural competency gaps extending beyond technical proficiency. These findings suggest that current coach education pathways insufficiently develop tactical facilitation and evaluative expertise within game-based instructional practices. Systematic curricular integration of practice-based modules explicitly targeting tactical intervention and performance evaluation is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.