ArticleScientific reports2026
Robust and intelligent control strategies for a 3-DOF robotic arm: a comparative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of PID, Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC), and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) strategies for trajectory tracking of a nonlinear 3-DOF robotic manipulator. A complete dynamic model is derived using the Euler-Lagrange formulation, incorporating inertia coupling, Coriolis and centrifugal effects, gravitational forces, and joint friction. The developed model is validated against published results, demonstrating close agreement in amplitude and phase characteristics under sinusoidal joint trajectories. The three controllers are implemented under identical conditions and evaluated in both joint space and Cartesian space using step inputs, infinity trajectories, and circular paths. Performance is quantitatively assessed using RMSE, ITAE, and IAE metrics. The results indicate that SMC achieves the highest tracking accuracy, reducing average RMSE by approximately 80% compared to PID, while FLC achieves nearly 50% improvement. In Cartesian tracking, SMC maintains peak position errors below 0.005 m, significantly outperforming PID, which exhibits deviations up to 0.11 m under dynamic motion. Statistical analysis further confirms improved robustness under the considered simulation scenarios and the consistency of SMC across all joints. The findings demonstrate that robust nonlinear control significantly enhances convergence speed, tracking precision, and disturbance rejection capability in planar 3-DOF manipulators. The validated modeling framework and systematic benchmarking provide practical guidance for selecting appropriate control strategies in industrial robotic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.