Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178321›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Robust and intelligent control strategies for a 3-DOF robotic arm: a comparative study.

Eman E Esmail, Mohamed Fawzy El-Khatib, M A Agwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eman E EsmailMechatronics and Robotics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo 11829, Egypt.
Mohamed Fawzy El-KhatibMechatronics and Robotics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo 11829, Egypt. muhamed-fawzy@eru.edu.eg.
M A AgwaMechanical Design and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of PID, Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC), and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) strategies for trajectory tracking of a nonlinear 3-DOF robotic manipulator. A complete dynamic model is derived using the Euler-Lagrange formulation, incorporating inertia coupling, Coriolis and centrifugal effects, gravitational forces, and joint friction. The developed model is validated against published results, demonstrating close agreement in amplitude and phase characteristics under sinusoidal joint trajectories. The three controllers are implemented under identical conditions and evaluated in both joint space and Cartesian space using step inputs, infinity trajectories, and circular paths. Performance is quantitatively assessed using RMSE, ITAE, and IAE metrics. The results indicate that SMC achieves the highest tracking accuracy, reducing average RMSE by approximately 80% compared to PID, while FLC achieves nearly 50% improvement. In Cartesian tracking, SMC maintains peak position errors below 0.005 m, significantly outperforming PID, which exhibits deviations up to 0.11 m under dynamic motion. Statistical analysis further confirms improved robustness under the considered simulation scenarios and the consistency of SMC across all joints. The findings demonstrate that robust nonlinear control significantly enhances convergence speed, tracking precision, and disturbance rejection capability in planar 3-DOF manipulators. The validated modeling framework and systematic benchmarking provide practical guidance for selecting appropriate control strategies in industrial robotic applications.

Indexed as

Fuzzy logic controlNonlinear controlPID controlRobotic manipulatorSliding mode controlTrajectory tracking

Identifiers

PMID42178321
PMCPMC13199480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.