ArticleVox sanguinis2026
In vivo recovery and in vitro quality assessment of apheresis red blood cells stored for 42 days in non-DEHP disposable sets.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDi(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) has been used in blood bag manufacturing for decades, but concern about its potential toxicity has prompted regulatory efforts to eliminate it from medical devices, including blood bags. As manufacturers transition to non-DEHP materials, evaluation is required to ensure blood component quality in modified bag systems. Investigational Trima Accel disposables were developed using plasticizers approved as DEHP alternatives per the European Pharmacopoeia. Red blood cells (RBCs) were collected, and two consecutive studies evaluated in vitro quality and in vivo RBC recovery. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsLeukoreduced RBCs (LR-RBCs) were stored in Additive Solution 3 (AS-3) at 2-6°C for 42 days. In vitro quality parameters measured on days 0, 35 and/or 42 were assessed against US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) acceptance criteria. A radiolabelling study evaluated in vivo 24-h RBC recovery using the FDA criteria.
resultsKey FDA criteria were met, including haemolysis, which remained below the acceptable limit throughout 42 days of storage. All EDQM criteria were met except Day 0 haematocrit, with 8 units outside the specified range and the confidence interval (CI) lower bound at 77.6%. All FDA criteria for in vivo 24-h RBC recovery were met.
conclusionApheresis LR-RBCs collected with Trima Accel systems using non-DEHP disposables and stored for 42 days met key FDA and EDQM criteria, with any in vitro parameter failures considered artefactual. Products also met FDA's 24-h in vivo RBC recovery criteria, supporting their use as acceptable transfusable products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.