SynthesisDrug testing and analysis2026
Analytical Methods for the Quantification of Drugs and Their Metabolites in Human Hair: A Systematic Review From 2010 to 2025.
Synthesis in Drug testing and analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hair has emerged as a valuable biological matrix for documenting long-term or cumulative drug exposure. Although hair analysis is well established in forensic toxicology, its potential application to monitor occupational exposure to hazardous drugs among healthcare workers remains unexplored. This systematic review aimed to describe analytical methods used for drug quantification in human hair and to assess the feasibility of applying this approach to hazardous drug exposure monitoring. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was conducted for studies published between January 2010 and March 2025 using the terms hair, matrix, drug, and analysis. Eligible studies reported quantitative measurements of drugs or metabolites in human hair. Data on study characteristics, analytical methods, and results (LOD, LOQ, concentration range in ng/mg) were extracted and descriptively analyzed. One hundred thirteen studies were included, mainly from Europe, most addressing forensic toxicology (77/113). The vertex posterior region was the preferred sampling site. Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with methanol and LC-MS/MS were the predominant analytical approaches, providing the lowest LODs and LOQs. A total of 233 analytes (152 drugs and 81 metabolites) were identified, mainly antidepressants, opioids, and antipsychotics. Only one study assessed a hazardous drug (soluble platinum compounds): Exposed workers showed median platinum levels of 3.24 versus 2.17 pg/mg in unexposed staff and 213 pg/mg in treated patients. Hair analysis is a promising, noninvasive approach for documenting long-term exposure to drugs. However, further studies are needed to validate its use for occupational biomonitoring of hazardous drugs in healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.