Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42178143›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Equity and Access in HIV Prevention: Addressing Global Disparities in PrEP Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Population.

Sijia Li, Alex Siu Wing Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sijia LiDepartment of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University,Hong Kong.
Alex Siu Wing ChanDepartment of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University,Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-4420-8789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite proven efficacy in preventing HIV, the global uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains limited and uneven, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM). A meta-analysis by Zhao et al. reveals that only 20% of PrEP-eligible MSM have ever used the medication, with stark disparities across regions and income levels. While uptake has increased over time, significant barriers persist, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These barriers include financial constraints, limited health care infrastructure, provider knowledge gaps, and pervasive stigma, which together impede equitable access to PrEP. In regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America, MSM face challenges related to health care access, while younger MSM and marginalized groups, including transgender individuals, are particularly underserved. This viewpoint calls for global strategies that address these inequities through targeted, evidence-based interventions that focus on reducing systemic barriers and incorporating intersectional approaches. To scale up PrEP access and ensure equitable HIV prevention, multilevel strategies are necessary, involving policy changes, provider training, community-led initiatives, and youth-centered outreach. Addressing the financial, structural, and social determinants of health is essential for bridging these gaps and ensuring that PrEP fulfills its potential as a global tool for HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisDeveloping CountriesGlobal HealthHumansMaleequity and accessglobal disparities low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)HIV preventionmen who have sex with men (MSM)pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Identifiers

PMID42178143
PMCPMC13199691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.