ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Rational Designs of Single-Atom Catalysts Loaded Hollow Microstructures for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.
Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are promising next-generation energy storage candidates with high theoretical specific capacity and low material cost. Despite these advantages, the practical application of LSBs is significantly hampered by the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) shuttle effect, poor sulfur conductivity, and sluggish LiPSs conversion kinetics. Numerous studies have confirmed that introducing catalysts to LSBs effectively addresses the sluggish conversion of LiPSs. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have demonstrated great potential in LSBs due to their high catalytic activity and nearly complete atom utilization. The synergistic effect of the hollow structure and the SACs addresses key limitations of SACs in LSBs, including agglomeration, insufficient LiPSs confinement, and poor volume buffering capability. Thus, SACsloaded hollow microstructures (SACs-HMs) are a superior strategy to address the LiPSs shuttle in LSBs. In this review, we first discuss the mechanistic roles and inherent challenges of SACs in suppressing the LiPSs shuttle. Subsequently, the structure-activity relationships of three hollow configurations (single, double, and yolk-shell) are comprehensively compared, highlighting their distinct impacts on battery performance. And we evaluate four synthesis methods (hard-template, soft-template, template-free, and self-template), outlining their respective advantages and limitations for crafting SACs-HMs. Lastly, a perspective on the future developments of SACs-HMs in LSBs applications is offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.