ArticleJournal of community health2026
A Participatory Mixed-Methodology Study of HIV and STI Testing Barriers Among Latino College Students in the California Inland Empire.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Young adults in the United States experience a disproportionate burden of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), with Latino populations and residents of California's inland regions facing compounded disparities. This study examined multilevel barriers to HIV and STI testing among Latino college students in the California Inland Empire using Group Concept Mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods participatory approach. Twenty-six students participated in brainstorming sessions, and nineteen completed sorting and rating activities. Analyses identified five clusters of barriers: access, awareness, and competing priorities; knowledge, social norms, and normalization of testing; structural and healthcare system barriers; emotional and relational barriers; and moralized sexual health stigma rooted in family, cultural, and religious norms. All clusters were rated as moderately to highly important, with access- and knowledge-related barriers emerging as the most influential. Go-zone analyses highlighted actionable targets, including improving access to low-cost testing, integrating sexual health into routine care, enhancing privacy and confidentiality, and fostering supportive provider and peer environments. Barriers perceived as less acceptable to address included culturally embedded stigma and limited sexual health education. Findings underscore the need for multilevel, culturally grounded interventions that address structural, interpersonal, and sociocultural factors to improve testing engagement and advance sexual health equity among Latino college students in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42177714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.