Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177708›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Very long-term outcomes of single-level minimally invasive tubular lumbar microdiscectomy with over 10 years follow-up.

Amit Persad, Eva Liu, Michael Kindrachuk, Eric Noyes, Daryl Fourney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit PersadUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Eva LiuUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. eva.liu@usask.ca.
Michael KindrachukUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Eric NoyesUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Daryl FourneyUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. daryl.fourney@usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy is an effective treatment for lumbar radiculopathy with similar outcomes compared to open approaches based on short and mid-term data. This study examines patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy with > 10 years of follow-up.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation from May 1, 2010, to July 31, 2013 by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. We measured VAS leg, VAS back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D-3 L and EQ-VAS scores as well as achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with outcome measures and reoperation.

results103 patients were included, with a mean age of 52.0 ± 14.9 years, and 52 (50.5%) were female. Patients were assessed at baseline, short-term (6 weeks), long-term (3.8 ± 1.2 years), and very long-term (11.6 ± 1.4 years) follow-up. All PROMs improved significantly after surgery and continued to improve with longer periods of follow-up (p < 0.01). The 10-year reoperation rate was 8.7%. Multivariate analysis showed Worker's Compensation Board status to be associated with worse outcomes at short-term follow-up and BMI > 30 to be associated with increased reoperation.

conclusionsWe found continued improvement in PROMs after tubular microdiscectomy with > 10 years follow-up. Tubular lumbar microdiscectomy is a procedure with minimal risk, low revision rate, and lasting clinical benefit after more than a decade.

Indexed as

Day surgeryLumbar discMicrodiscectomyMinimally invasiveSpine surgeryTubular retractor

Identifiers

PMID42177708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.