Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177703›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

Thermal safety during retrograde intrarenal surgery and laser lithotripsy. Changes of intrarenal temperature while using direct-in-scope-suction : an in-vitro study by young academic urologists and EAU endourology sections.

Begoña Ballesta Martinez, Angelis Peteinaris, Vineet Gauhar, Theodoros Spinos, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Paula Manzi Orezzoli, Arman Tsaturyan, Amelia Pietropaolo, Francisco J Lopez Vivo, Laurian Dragos and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Begoña Ballesta MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopo, Alicante, Spain. bballestamartinez@gmail.com.
Angelis PeteinarisEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Vineet GauharEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Theodoros SpinosEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Eugenio VentimigliaEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Paula Manzi OrezzoliDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopo, Alicante, Spain.
Arman TsaturyanEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Amelia PietropaoloEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Francisco J Lopez VivoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopo, Alicante, Spain.
Laurian DragosEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Peter KronenbergDepartment of Urology, Decobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
Lukas NowakDepartment of Minimally Invasice and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis KallidonisEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Steffi Kar Kei YuenDepartment of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong, China.
Oriol AngerriEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Olivier TraxerEAU Section of Endourology Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Bhaskar SomaniEAU Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group Arnhem, NL-6803, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the intrarenal temperature (IRT) variations using the 9.2Fr and 7.5Fr flexible ureteroscopes featuring direct-in-scope suction (DISS-FURS) in an in-vitro set up in different inflow and outflow irrigation conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe experimental setting consisted of two DISS-FURS: a 7.5Fr ureteroscope with a 3.6Fr working channel (WC), and a 9.2Fr scope with a 5.1Fr WC. An Aldaver upper urinary tract model was used, and IRT was continuously monitored using a calibrated digital thermometer. Temperature dynamics were assessed by measuring the time required for IRT to increase from physiological baseline (37 °C) to 43 °C, from 43 to 50 °C, and the time required for IRT to decrease from 50 °C to 43 °C and to 37 °C following laser deactivation. Measurements were performed using a 272-µm laser fiber. A Holmium: YAG laser was activated continuously at power settings of 10 and 20 W. Experiments were conducted under the following conditions: with/without ureteral access sheath (UAS), with gravity-driven irrigation alone, with manual pump-assisted irrigation, and with/without activation of the DISS system. Thermal dose was calculated using the cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43). A total of 32 experimental cohorts (96 experiments) were analyzed.

resultsFor the 7.5Fr DISS FURS, the safest combinations, defined by slower IRT rise and more controlled thermal profiles, were those with manual pump-assisted irrigation, use of UAS and no DISS activation. IRT increased more rapidly at 20 W in cohorts combining DISS activation without manual pump assistance and without UAS. In experiments performed with the 9.2Fr DISS FURS, manual pump-assisted irrigation and the use of UAS represented the safest maneuver for maintaining controlled IRT levels. The larger 5.1Fr WC allowed increased inflow, prolonging the time to critical temperature thresholds even when DISS was activated.

conclusionsThe combination of manual pump-assisted irrigation, UAS use, and the 9.2 Fr DISS flexible ureteroscope with a 5.1 Fr working channel provided the most favorable intrarenal temperature profile. In contrast, simultaneous activation of suction and laser with the smaller 7.5Fr scope, particularly without adequate irrigation, may increase thermal risk and should be used with caution. These findings suggest that optimizing irrigation dynamics and coordinating suction use are key to minimizing thermal risks during DISS-assisted FURS. Further clinical studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureKidneyLithotripsy, LaserUreteroscopesUreteroscopyEquipment DesignHumansIn Vitro TechniquesSuctionTemperatureUrologistsUrologyDISSFURSIntrarenal fluid temperatureSuction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.