Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177701›Full record

ReviewCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026

Real-world efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockades in advanced urothelial carcinoma with histologic variant subtypes: the pembroblad study.

Karim Amrane, Luca Campedel, Fabien Moinard-Butot, Mathilde Gout, Hakim Mahammedi, Mostefa Bennamoun, Tressie Herrmann, Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Damien Pouessel, Matthieu Roulleaux-Dugage and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Karim AmraneDépartement d'Innovation Thérapeutique Et Des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France. karim.amrane@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1357-1120
Luca CampedelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Etienne University Hospital Center, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Fabien Moinard-ButotDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Mathilde GoutDepartment of Medical Oncology Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Hakim MahammediDepartment of Medical Oncology Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mostefa BennamounDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Tressie HerrmannDepartment of Medical Oncology Jean Perrin Cancer Center, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pierre-Etienne GabrielDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Damien PouesselUniv Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Matthieu Roulleaux-DugageDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Constance ThibaultDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP.Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Mathilde CancelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Tours, France.
Aude FlechonLéon Bérard Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Lyon, France.
Olivier HuillardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Université Paris Cité, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Paris, France.
Baptiste AbbarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Delphine BorchielliniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.
Louis DoubletHôpital Privé Drôme-Ardèche, Valence, France.
Laëtitia Augusto-PelegrinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Elouen BoughalemOncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Angers, France.
Pierre CornillonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Etienne University Hospital Center, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France.
Clément DumontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
Philippe BarthélémyDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistologic variants (HV) of urothelial carcinoma (UC-V) and non-urothelial carcinomas (NUC) of the bladder and urinary tract are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis and limited response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Despite their biological particularities and distinct immune microenvironments, these HV subtypes are under-represented in immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) trials.

methodsPEMBROBLAD is a French national multicenter retrospective study conducted across 24 centers. We included patients with advanced UC-V or NUC who received second-line anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy between 2016 and 2022. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

resultsWe included 129 UC-V and 34 NUC. With a median follow-up was 21.9 months, the median OS was 8.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3-11.2] months, with 8.5 [95% CI 5.3-10.9] months for UC-V and 10.5[95% CI 3.5-22.8] months for NUC. The median PFS was 2.6 [95% CI 2.1-3.4] months with 2.5 [95% CI 2.0-3.4] months for the UC-V group and 2.6 [2.0-3.4] months for the NUC group. ORR was 31.4% overall (complete response 15.3%, partial response 16.1%). In multivariable analysis, ECOG performance status ≥ 2 was independently associated with both poorer OS (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.22-8.92; p = 0.018) and PFS (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.52-3.54; p < 0.001). Pembrolizumab treatment was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.81; p = 0.017). Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10.8% of patients, with no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionsAnti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy shows clinical benefit in advanced UC-V and NUC after platinum failure.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdvanced urothelial carcinomaHistological variantsImmune Checkpoint BlockadeReal-world studySquamuous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42177701
PMCPMC13388587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.