ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026
The faecal bulk heterogeneity: implications for homogenisation and spot-sampling strategies for metabolomic investigations.
Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFaecal metabolomics investigates small molecules in stool to elucidate metabolic pathways and identify potential biomarkers. However, topographical heterogeneity within individual stool specimens poses a challenge for data consistency. Although this issue is well recognised, quantitative comparisons across defined stool regions, sampling depths, and whole-stool homogenates remain limited.
objectivesThis pilot study aimed to (i) quantify metabolite variation across five regions (from head to tail) and different depths of the faecal bulk, and (ii) determine whether spot sampling can serve as a representative alternative to whole-stool homogenisation for faecal metabolite profiling by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (
methodsSeventy-six metabolites were quantified across defined faecal regions and depths. Comparative analyses determined spatial differences in metabolite abundance and assessed the similarity between spot samples and bulk homogenates.
resultsDistinct metabolic profiles were observed between the two ends of the faecal bulk. The tail region, representing more recently discharged material, exhibited higher levels of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)propionate (+ 57-58%) and 3-phenylpropionate (+ 50%), whereas the head region showed greater abundance of proteolysis-related metabolites such as isovalerate (+ 30%) and methionine (+ 54%). No consistent differences were detected across sampling depths. Despite these metabolite-specific differences, overall deviations from the homogenised profile were small, with mean absolute differences remaining approximately 1% or less across regions.
conclusionPronounced longitudinal heterogeneity exists in faecal metabolite composition along the stool axis. In this pilot cohort, tail-region spot sampling most closely represents the overall faecal metabolome and may serve as a practical, less labour-intensive alternative to whole-stool homogenisation for metabolomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.