SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Utility of Acupuncture Therapy for Adult Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acupuncture versus Sham Acupuncture for Migraine without Aura: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic daily headache (CDH) management remains challenging due to limited efficacy of standard preventive pharmacotherapies. Acupuncture has shown promise in chronic headache management. This study evaluated its sustained prophylactic efficacy for CDH. MATERIAL AND METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Sinomed, and Wanfang Data (inception to September 2025) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with other interventions for CDH. Primary outcomes included headache frequency, days, intensity, duration, and analgesic use; subgroup analyses covered treatment modality, CDH subtype, and duration. RESULTS Twenty-two RCTs (1449 patients) were included. Compared with control, acupuncture significantly reduced headache frequency (mean difference [MD], -0.32; P=0.001), headache days (MD, -0.72; P<0.00001), intensity (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.63; P=0.001), duration (SMD, -1.18; P=0.0001), and analgesic use (MD, -0.52; P<0.00001) after the intervention. These benefits persisted during follow-up: headache days (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.70; P<0.00001), intensity (SMD, -1.11; P=0.008), duration (SMD, -1.83; P=0.003), and analgesic use (SMD, -0.60; P=0.007) remained reduced; headache frequency showed a trend toward reduction (SMD, -0.47; P=0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent efficacy across various CDH subtypes, including chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache, treatment durations (4-12 weeks), and intervention strategies (acupuncture alone or combined with medication), indicating broad clinical applicability. CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture yields clinically meaningful, sustained improvements in CDH, supporting its role as an effective routine and adjunctive prophylaxis and broader application in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.