Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42177585›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Anxiety and neurophysiological correlates of stuttering severity in adults who stutter.

Agit Şimşek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Agit ŞimşekDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, İnönü University, Malatya, Türkiye. agit.simsek@inonu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-1188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStuttering has traditionally been conceptualized as a motor speech disorder; however, accumulating evidence suggests that auditory processing differences and emotional factors may also contribute to its clinical presentation. Despite increasing interest in these domains, the interplay between auditory cortical processing, stuttering severity, and anxiety in adults remains incompletely understood.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine auditory evoked cortical responses (P1, N1, P2, and mismatch negativity [MMN]) in adults who stutter compared with fluent-speaking controls, and to explore how neurophysiological measures vary in relation to stuttering severity and state-trait anxiety levels.

methodsAuditory event-related potentials were recorded using pure-tone stimuli in adults who stutter and age-matched control participants. Latency and amplitude measures of the P1, N1, P2, and MMN components were analyzed. Anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Group comparisons and correlational analyses were performed to characterize neurophysiological, clinical, and psychological patterns.

resultsCompared with controls, adults who stutter exhibited significant alterations in both early (P1, N1) and later (P2, MMN) stages of auditory cortical processing. Increasing stuttering severity appeared to be associated with a pattern of variation in ERP latencies and amplitudes, accompanied by parallel changes in state, trait, and total anxiety scores.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that stuttering in adulthood is associated with widespread differences in auditory cortical processing that co-vary with both anxiety levels and clinical severity. The results support a multidimensional framework in which sensory, emotional, and speech-related processes interact, highlighting the importance of integrated neurophysiological and psychological assessment approaches in stuttering research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnxietyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryStutteringAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultAnxietyAuditory cortical processingEvent-related potentials (ERP)Mismatch negativity (MMN)Stuttering

Identifiers

PMID42177585
PMCPMC13374295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.