ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Malignant lymph nodes of the head and neck: imaging pearls, pitfalls, and practical approach to reporting in the era of extranodal extension.
Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate characterization and reporting of cervical lymph nodes is critical when evaluating head and neck malignancies, as findings directly impact staging, treatment planning, and prognosis. Knowledge of lymphatic drainage patterns predicts nodal spread of disease and conversely, may help in identifying primary malignancy. Variability in size criteria for an abnormal lymph node across literature makes reporting difficult when used in isolation; however, careful attention to morphologic changes improves diagnostic accuracy. FDG-PET imaging serves as a valuable complementary tool when available, detecting metabolically active nodes that may appear normal on anatomic imaging. Identifying radiologic features of extranodal extension impacts AJCC staging and subsequently, treatment course. For lymphoproliferative disorders, diffuse lymphadenopathy presents a challenge in reporting size and number of lymph nodes. This article provides a systematic, reproducible checklist approach for lymph node reporting in the head and neck, thereby reducing inter-reader variability and producing a useful radiologic report for the multidisciplinary team.Clinical trial number Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.