ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
A study on the optimal timing for Rib fracture surgery: A report from a single center is earlier surgery always better?
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is increasingly employed in the management of rib fractures. Current guidelines recommend performing SSRF within 48 to 72 h post-injury. This study aimed to validate this recommendation using data from a single center in China.
methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to investigate the effects of different surgical timings on the length of hospital stay, ICU stay, incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, postoperative respiratory failure, pain scores at 1 week after surgery, and pain and quality of life scores at 1 and 6 months post-discharge in patients with rib fractures.
resultsA total of 3899 patients were analyzed. The early surgery group (≤ 72 h) had significantly shorter hospital and ICU stays compared to the delayed surgery group (> 72 h) (P ≤ 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, or pain scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months post-discharge between the two groups. However, quality of life scores at 1 and 6 months post-surgery were significantly higher in the early surgery group (P < 0.001). Additionally, within the early surgery group, those who underwent surgery within 48 h of injury had a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.003).
conclusionsSSRF performed early after injury can significantly shorten hospital and ICU stays and improve patients' quality of life for six months. SSRF performed within 48 h post-injury is recommended to achieve better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.