ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Democratising health and social care research through long-term public involvement and engagement: a qualitative process evaluation of the Community Research and Engagement Network (CoREN).
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Questions for more insightful and useful analyses of barriers and facilitators to public involvement and engagement in health research: a critical narrative review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInterest in public involvement in UK health and social care research continues to grow, yet many initiatives are short-lived and offer public collaborators little meaningful influence. Established in 2019 within the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), the Community Research and Engagement Network (CoREN) was created to provide a sustained platform for co-production of health and social care research. This article reports a theory-informed qualitative process evaluation of the CoREN, examining its progress towards democratic, long-term co-production and the factors that enable or impede it.
methodsMethodologically, a qualitative, relational approach informed by deliberative democratic theory was used. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with CoREN Leadership Group members (n=6) and affiliated researchers (n=4) and three focus groups with community members and partners (total n=17). Framework analysis was applied using a priori and inductive codes.
resultsParticipants described the CoREN as a coordinating nexus that connects researchers and community organisations, brokers relationships and "plants seeds" that later grow into co-produced projects. Other key impacts included amplifying community voices in the research process, helping to equalise power dynamics in researcher-community relationships, and building research literacy and capacity within communities. Challenges included a lack of clarity regarding the CoREN's role and structure, bureaucratic inertia, and difficulties in including a representative range of diverse and less privileged communities across the region.
conclusionsThe CoREN model demonstrates the promise of sustained, non-project-bound engagement networks as a means of strengthening democratic participation in research and building capacity for future co-production. Sustained investment, ongoing feedback and evaluation, and a commitment to overcoming structural barriers to participation are needed to ensure that progress towards equitable community-led research is maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.