ArticleBMC medical education2026
Changes in medical students' perceptions of ethical climate during their medical training: a follow-up study of a student cohort.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEthical climate is an important component of professional development in medical education, yet little is known about how medical students' perceptions of ethical climate evolve during training or whether these perceptions are associated with career intentions. This study aimed to examine longitudinal changes in perceived and desired ethical climate among medical students and to explore potential associations with intended residency choice.
methodsWe conducted a follow-up study of a student cohort among medical students enrolled in the Croatian-language medical program at the University of Split School of Medicine. Ethical climate was assessed using the Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ), which evaluates nine ethical climate domains. Data were collected during the third and the sixth year of study. Students completed both perceived and desired versions of the ECQ. Paired analyses were performed for students who participated at both time points, while independent-sample analyses compared third and sixth-year cohorts. Ethical climate domains were also examined in relation to students' desired residency choice.
resultsA total of 70 third year and 77 sixth-year students participated, with 57 students included in paired analyses. The two dominant climates were Company profit and Laws and professional codes. Perceived ethical climate scores decreased significantly from the third to the sixth year in the Company rules and procedures (p < 0.001), while other domains remained stable. No statistically significant differences were observed in desired ethical climate domains between the third and sixth study years after Bonferroni correction. No associations were found between ethical climate domains and intended residency choice.
conclusionsMedical students' perceptions of institutional ethical climate change during undergraduate training, particularly regarding organizational structure, while ethical ideals remain largely stable. Ethical climate perceptions do not appear associated with residency choice, suggesting that ethical development and career decision-making may follow distinct trajectories. These findings highlight the importance of addressing the hidden curriculum and supporting structured reflection on ethical tensions encountered during clinical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.