ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Sustained and discontinued operational changes to ethics committees in the post-pandemic era: a qualitative study in Kenya.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthics Committees (ECs) play a vital role in protecting the rights, safety, and welfare of human participants enrolled in research. In special circumstances such as pandemics, ECs conduct a rapid review of research protocols to respond to a Public Health Emergency (PHE). Globally, many ECs made operational changes to their processes during the COVID-19 era in a bid to continue providing research oversight amidst strict measures to combat the spread of the disease. Little is known about any sustained and/or discontinued EC operational adjustments made during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored the EC operational changes that were retained and those that were dropped after the COVID-19 pandemic and any preparedness plans for potential future PHEs.
methodsThis explorative qualitative study used in-depth interviews to gather data from target population of EC members, chairpersons, secretaries, and research administrators from selected ECs in Kenya that were operational during the pandemic. Data was collected between July and October 2025. We used purposive and snowballing methods until saturation was reached. We developed codes using both inductive and deductive approaches while adopting the five-stage framework analysis method of data familiarization, thematic framework development, code generation, thematic map generation, and examination of data patterns. We used NVIVO version 12 software to analyze the data.
resultsA total of 16 participants from the 7 selected ECs in Kenya took part in the study. We generated three (3) broad themes and various sub-themes from the analysis of in-depth interviews: (1) EC operational adjustments retained post-pandemic included technological adoption in protocol submissions and virtual meetings, frameworks for decentralized research, and discussants for protocol review meetings (2) EC operational adjustments dropped in the post-pandemic era included special COVID-19 scientific committees, parallel reviews between ECs and national regulator, quick turnaround reviews, and COVID-19 sensitization sessions during EC meetings (3) EC future directions in preparation for other PHEs included reciprocal approvals, community engagement plans, verbal presentation of protocols, continuous ethics education, and additional EC secretariat support.
conclusionsIn Kenya, ECs have retained selective operations that enhance efficiency and have discontinued practices that were directly related to the emergency situation and those that were deemed unsustainable in the long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.