SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral health challenges in older individuals are often intensified by physiological and pathological changes associated with aging, leading to several oral conditions. Xerostomia and hyposalivation are common problems affecting quality of life. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older individuals aged 60 years and above.
methodsA comprehensive search strategy was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and ProQuest) for articles published from inception to April 2026. Studies assessing xerostomia or hyposalivation in participants aged ≥ 60 years were included, while studies involving patients with systemic conditions known to cause xerostomia and/or hyposalivation, or those who had previously undergone radiotherapy, were excluded. The quality assessment was performed using a tool adapted from Hoy et al. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity.
resultsThe inclusion of 128 eligible publications comprising 174,698 participants reporting on the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation. The included studies comprised a total of 170,803 individuals for xerostomia and 10,396 individuals for hyposalivation, with reported age ranges of 60-107 years and 60-103 years, respectively. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia (n = 119 study populations) was 32.4% (95% CI: 29.6%, 35.2%; I² = 99.3%), while that of hyposalivation (n = 32) was 33.0% (95% CI: 25.7%, 42.0%; I² = 98.6%). No evidence of publication bias was observed, and all sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main analyses. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any apparent sources of heterogeneity. Most of the studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias for both xerostomia and hyposalivation.
conclusionThe prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation among older adults aged ≥ 60 years was approximately one-third, indicating a considerable burden in this population. However, the high degree of heterogeneity suggests substantial variability across studies, and the pooled estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.