ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Automated measurement of the minimum macular hole diameter based on optical coherence tomography images.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of minimum macular hole (MH) diameter is essential for diagnosis and treatment. The manual measurement approach by ophthalmologists is time-consuming, poorly reproducible, and exhibits high inter-observer variability. Threshold-based methods are sensitive to image quality, and perform inadequately in low-contrast optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Deep learning can achieve higher measurement accuracy but shows limited generalization capability.
methodsWe propose an automated measurement method comprising three sub-tasks. Specifically, a tailored MH dataset is first created by cropping publicly available OCT images to minimize interference from non-MH regions. Subsequently, an image processing pipeline, which consists of denoising, binarization, morphological operations, and edge detection, is implemented to extract the contours on both sides of MH. Finally, an automated measurement algorithm is designed to locate the closest points on the bilateral contours of MH and thereby calculate the minimum diameter.
resultsExtensive experiments are conducted to validate the effectiveness of this research. More concretely, on the public dataset, the [Formula: see text] metric obtained by the proposed method closely aligns with the [Formula: see text] metric. The ADE values are predominantly within 1 pixel, achieving as low as 0.00 in some cases. Simultaneously, the method demonstrates favorable performance in the RDE metric, with values ranging from 0.00% to 3.29%, most of which remain below 2.50%. Furthermore, in clinical testing, the measurement time per individual sample is approximately 4 seconds, indicating high efficiency.
conclusionsOverall, the comprehensive quantitative and qualitative experimental results confirm the method's commendable accuracy and execution efficiency in measuring the minimum MH diameter, demonstrating its potential value in assisting ophthalmologists with the diagnosis and treatment assessment of MH conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.