ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Relevance of clinical ethics support services in specialized outpatient palliative care teams and inpatient hospices.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesClinical ethics support services (CES) may support palliative care teams in ethical conflicts. However, it is not known to what extent these services are available, used and how their relevance is perceived by the teams. The study focuses on the accessibility and evaluation of ethics consultations in specialized outpatient palliative care teams and inpatient hospices.
methodsThis study conducted a cross-sectional 21-item anonymous survey among teams of registered specialized outpatient palliative care services (n = 304) and inpatient hospices (n = 260) in Germany concerning availability, utilization and evaluation of clinical ethics support services.
resultsA total of 175 (58%) specialized outpatient palliative care teams and 102 (39%) inpatient hospice teams responded to the questionnaire; of these two-thirds have access to CES. A number of ethical challenges were reported in these settings, many of which are perceived as burdensome. However, satisfaction with existing services is rather moderate and teams report fewer than five consultations per year. Nevertheless, ethics consultation is regarded as being highly useful, with positive effects reported, including enhanced confidence in decision-making processes and reduced burden for team members. Interestingly, team members with formal training in clinical ethics had a significant positive impact on the perception of CES and the frequency of consultations.
conclusionAlthough specialized outpatient palliative care and inpatient hospice teams reported facing a number of burdensome ethical challenges, ethics consultations fall short of accessibility to CES. This discrepancy can be resolved by structured training of team members in clinical ethics to increase the level of awareness and utilization of CES in specialized outpatient palliative care and inpatient hospices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.