ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Fine scale gene expression dynamics at the foliar level reveal grapevine strategies to cope with recurrent drought stress.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe frequency of consecutive and often leading to extreme drought events is increasing in the Mediterranean region, shaping the physiological strategies that grapevine plants employ to cope with recurring water stress. This study evaluates the effects of two recurrent drought cycles, each followed by rewatering, on potted plants of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc.
resultsPhysiological measurements were combined with transcriptomic analysis, performed on leaf samples collected every six hours during the last day of drought cycle and subsequent rewatering. RNA-Seq results showed temporal and cycle-dependent dynamics in genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, abscisic acid, and photosynthesis. By analyzing gene expressions throughout the day in both drought cycles, we observed conserved and distinct transcriptional patterns, with different processes activated or repressed depending on the time of day and the cycle (drought or recovery). Conserved genes such as galactinol synthase and dehydrin were present in both cycles most of the time. On the other hand, it was observed that plants change from immediate defense and stress mitigation in the first drought cycle to more centered on metabolic changes and acclimative adjustments during the second drought and at the end of the day.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that grapevines adjust their molecular responses after an initial drought episode, consistent with acclimation or possible stress-priming mechanisms, useful to better cope with subsequent water deficits. This fine-scale temporal perspective provides insight into the strategies that Vitis vinifera implement to survive recurring drought, with relevance for improving grapevine management under climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.