ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Recent population history in Swedish cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn genetic terms, the history of a population can be described by its effective population size over time. We know that domestic cattle have gone through dramatic changes in recent history, including intensifying selection in modern breeding programs and replacement of traditional breeds. In this work, we use linkage disequilibrium-based methods to estimate recent population history from genotype data in Swedish cattle breeds, as well as international Holstein and Jersey cattle data for comparison. We used population genetic simulation to check the inferences.
resultsOur results suggest that the breeds have been effectively large up until recently, when they declined around the onset of systematic breeding. The inferred trajectories were qualitatively similar, with a large historical population and one decline. When comparing simulations from the estimated population histories to real data, the proportion of low-frequency variants in real data was different from what was implied by the estimated population histories, and there was somewhat higher genomic inbreeding in real data than implied by the estimated histories.
conclusionsThe estimates of recent population history of cattle imply that much of the variation we see today is transient, and it will be lost as the populations settle into a new equilibrium, even if efforts to maintain effective population size at current levels are successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.